|
Last week's issue of The Falcon featured an article about the
pretend assassination games of "Mafia," "Assassin," and "Stratego
Live." On the very next page was an editorial about the recent
Northern Illinois University shootings in which a student killed
six classmates.
The picture that was included with the feature on assassination
games featured a silhouette of two men walking around campus with
Nerf guns. The men stalking around campus looked like an eerie
rendition of the NIU shootings. It's inappropriate and
disrespectful in wake of real school shootings to be playing fake
assassination games on campus.
I'm not arguing whether these assassination games are right or
wrong, or even that they should never be played; I'm simply
questioning if they are appropriate on campus. Is it respectful to
pretend to kill other students when lately there has been a trend
of actual killings on campuses?
I realize these games are not directly reenacting a school
shooting. They are acting out strategy games that involve the
pretend killing of another person.
If you think that's a good enough reason to play them on campus,
though, think about this: suppose there was a real trend of mass
rapes happening on American college campuses. Then imagine if
students were pretending to rape each other, but justifying it by
saying, "Our actions are unconnected from the actual rapes. We're
just acting out a strategy game." Do you think that would make
pretend rape appropriate or excusable?
What sort of logical counter argument could respond to this
example?
"We're not pretending to rape anyone, just kill them. Why does
it matter that there have been school shootings? Our killing is
merely pretend."
No matter what it is based off of, the action of pretending to
kill students on campus resembles the same action of school
shootings.
This isn't just a rousing game of "capture the flag." This game
involves sneaking and scheming around campus with pretend guns.
According to last week's article, when a kill is made in the game
Assassin, "Eliminations were made by drawing a line with the marker
across the other player's throat." The hands-on nature of these
pretend acts of violence mimics too closely what actual school
killings might look like.
Some of these games do have rules that try to respect students
who might not like to see pretend murders happen outside of Gwinn
Commons.
Nathan Kato, who co-wrote the feature on on-campus games,
explained, "Non-game playing bystanders are technically not
supposed to see the attacks."
Ideally, when the pretend kill is made, students that aren't
playing the game won't be around to see it. Paul Comrie the other
author of the original article explained, "I got the impression
that many attacks were made when the vicinity was empty of
witnesses or at night when most people were in doors."
Such rules are not enough. How could you ever ensure that no one
would see the pretend assassinations? Personally, I have seen them
happen more than once near Tiffany Loop.
So, why are these games still allowed on campus? Advocates say
it is great for student bonding.
Freshman Nate Corley said, "It's the only floor activity our
entire floor has participated in." These games are bringing floors
together to achieve the sacred thing SPU loves to call community.
However, there must be a line between encouraging bonding and what
is appropriate in light of campus shootings.
Junior Shelly DeLaney pointed out that not all community bonding
is on behalf of a worthy cause. "Wow. They justify this game
because it brings together community? Hitler Youth brought together
community, too. Maybe they could become communists and call each
other brothers or comrades. That's community. Not everything that
brings people together should be permissible. They shouldn't be
pretending to kill each other on campus just because it helps them
bond."
It's not that these games should necessarily be completely
outlawed. The problem is that an objective eye would see a strange
likeness to the violence involved in recent campus shootings. The
players of these games should take their bonding somewhere
else.
|