
courtesy of Sony Pictures
Secret service agents Kent Taylor (Matthew Fox, left), Thomas Barnes (Dennis Quaid, center right), and Holden (Richard T. Jones, right) protect U.S. President Ashton (William Hurt, center left).
|
What happens when you put a first-time director, a sloppy
advertising campaign and an all-star cast together? "Vantage
Point," that's what. It's a fascinating look into how modern
technology has led to disconnected lives and the consequences
thereof. Unluckily, it's almost undone by one of the very things
that make it unique.
The way the film tells the story is paradoxically both a
strength and weakness. It begins with a journalist named Rex Brooks
(Sigourney Weaver) in a reporter's room monitoring one of the
biggest summits in memory, with the President of the United States,
President Ashton (William Hurt), about to forge a groundbreaking
alliance with Middle Eastern leaders in Salamanca, Spain. Before
anything can really happen, though, the president is shot and chaos
ensues.
The film rewinds 23 minutes and enters the perspective of
another person: secret service agent Thomas Barnes (Dennis Quaid),
who took a bullet for the president months before and has been
recovering both physically and psychologically ever since. He's
accompanied by his partner, Kent Taylor (Matthew Fox), and we
follow their perspective for a while.
Then we rewind again and switch to another point of view. Then
another. And again. And again. And again.
The film resets to noon every time it offers a fresh perception
on the situation, but unfortunately this gets tedious after the
third or fourth time. It's unfortunate that this technique doesn't
work as well as the filmmakers would like it to.
Each time it goes back, audiences are offered an entirely
different perspective on the situation, and it's kind of fun to try
to figure out how all of them are interconnected. It challenges
viewers to look for all the details in the shot and recall back to
other viewpoints to figure out what it's going to do next.
From the trailers, though, it seems like it's going to offer
insight into the way people's lives interconnect, in the vein of
"Crash" and "Babel." But the editing methods make it seem like a
bit of a cop-out. It would have been more challenging if the
filmmakers had tried to weave the stories like a tapestry, with
each thread distinct from the others. Instead, they build it like a
tower of Lego blocks where each piece is big, clunky and too easily
seen.
If a more compact and efficient way had been found to make this
technique work, it would have been enjoyable rather than a bit of a
chore. Audience members won't be able to help feeling a little bit
exasperated every time they're basically forced back to the
beginning.
It's also a bummer that the advertising executives had to go and
flub one of the biggest reveals of the movie in the trailer.
One thing that makes it consistently watchable, though, is the
top-notch cast. Nearly every other face here is a superstar.
Matthew Fox of "Lost" as Barnes's partner is effortlessly
charismatic.
William Hurt as the President brings the perfect amount of
gravitas to his role.
Forest Whitaker is brilliant as an unassuming tourist caught in
the middle of it all.
Sigourney Weaver as the hard-hitting reporter, though she ends
up being little more than a cameo, is pretty entertaining.
Dennis Quaid as Barnes, the fallen agent who must deal with the
guilt of not having protected the president this time around,
sometimes takes himself a little too seriously, but he does his
character justice. It's also a blessing that he's a likeable guy,
as the movie's plot rests mostly on his shoulders.
The action in the film is somewhat diluted because of the
flashback technique, but in the final 15 minutes, there's a car
chase throughout the city that's riveting, tense and incredibly
well-edited. It's the best part of the entire movie, partly due to
the fact that the audience knows they won't have to sit through it
five or six more times.
While "Vantage Point" is a bit of a disappointment and its
attempts at being an intelligent thriller aren't entirely
unsuccessful, it does offer some biting commentary into how the
electronic devices we use, such as cameras and cell phones,
disconnect society, making us need something like a bomb going off
to bring us together. It is regrettable that the sloppy handling of
the "vantage point" technique almost undoes what could have been a
carefree and viscerally enjoyable hour and a half, but that doesn't
mean it's not worth seeing.
If you can get past watching the same event transpire about six
times, it'll be an entertaining ride.
Plot: B-
Acting: A-
Action: B
Overall: B-
|