
Alex Moore
|
The gala marking the end of SPU's fundraising campaign featured
a string quartet, endive rolls and a large ice sculpture bearing
the university name and torch insignia. It was also, in the words
of master of ceremonies Skip Li, "a celebration that really should
not have taken place."
Soon after SPU commenced a capital campaign intended to raise
over $50 million, Sept. 11and the economic recession struck and
President Phil Eaton described many nights when he woke up overcome
with doubt.
At the March 29 gala, Eaton revealed the final numbers: the
Campaign for Seattle Pacific University exceeded its $52.85 million
goal by over $3 million, for a total of $55,875,000 raised over the
course of the past six-and-a-half years.
The total is the largest for any campaign in SPU history, and
brings with it a host of other record-setting numbers.
--Almost 16,000 people donated, twice as many as the last
campaign, and 4,000 of those were first-time SPU donors.
--The average gift size doubled to $1,116.
--Faculty and staff contributions rose 250 percent.
--In the last campaign, there was one donor who gave a gift of
more than $1 million; in this campaign there were 16.
--Sixty-four donors gave $100,000 or more, including physics
professor Robert Hughson and President Eaton himself.
And 465 students donated, a number mentioned several times by
speakers at the gala and again by Vice President of University
Advancement Bob McIntosh in a phone interview.
"It was an incredible, almost emotional thing for me to see," he
said.
The Campaign was divided into five separate initiatives, each
designed to raise money for a different aspect of the
university.
The largest initiative raised a total of $29.4 million for SPU's
endowment, $8.4 million more than the original goal. A university's
endowment is a pool of donated money that both guarantees that the
school has assets independent of inflation and also is invested so
as to provide continuous income for the school. The larger the
endowment, the more money the school has for scholarships and
academic programs.
Although the campaign raised almost $30 million, two-thirds of
that amount is in the form of wills and other deferred gifts, and
so will not begin working for the school until later.
The $9.7 million in current gifts, however, raises SPU's
endowment to $28.5 million, which means that next year SPU students
will see $1.1 million available for scholarships and academic
programs, according to the Report to Contributors.
Two other initiatives also exceeded their goals. The University
Fund Initiative raised $8.7 million for unrestricted student
scholarships, and the Restricted Annual Fund Initiative received
$7.6 million in gifts that donors designated for specific uses
within the university, such as money for the women's soccer program
and a collection of folk instruments.
The economy, however, did take its toll, McIntosh said, and two
of the initiatives did not manage to meet their goals.
The goal of the Center for Scholarship and Faculty Development
Initiative, McIntosh said, was to create both a center to encourage
Christian scholarship and several endowed chairs, positions in
academic departments funded in perpetuity by endowments.
In the beginning, a number of people had expressed interest in
making donations of $1 million or more, McIntosh said, but after
the economic downturn following Sept. 11, many of them found
themselves unable to spare the money, leaving the initiative almost
$4 million short of the $11 million goal.
The money was enough to create the Center for Scholarship and
Academic Development, which has brought numerous speakers such as
Stephen Carter and John Medina to SPU, but according to the Report
to Contributors, will have to be supplemented in order to continue
expansion of Center programming.
The Science Initiative, which primarily raised money for science
equipment, also suffered, losing potential donors from economic
hardship.
"We had talked to two major donors before we launched the
campaign who had indicated that they would be able to underwrite
that full initiative," McIntosh said. But in the end, they simply
didn't have the money to give.
The bright side, McIntosh said, is that the problem was a lack
of ability to give and not a lack of desire.
"I think many of these people will be here for SPU in the
future," he said.
And one reason for that, he said, is the student body.
"Time and time again during this campaign, I've had donors
giving to this school because of the students, and they comment on
the students and how impressed they are," he said. "The way the
conduct themselves on and off campus is having a major impact on
this city. They may not be around to benefit from it, but it bodes
well for the future generations of student who come to this
school."
|